Jack- I apologize for my untimely response. This blog bind seems to have escaped me. I don’t really be to point out anything that Hansen the Horrible has not already made obvious to the keen eye. He once again demonstrates his lack of respect to the African-American community and proudly pops off about the breathen that were come and dear to his heart in the culturally diverese melting pot known as Utah! What is the end drink about 98% color there Greggy? No wonder why you call it home. I am going to go away a survey: Which month will Hansen officially move back on the bandwagon for UofA basketball? My anticipate is that he will create another piece of garbage sometime in early walk admitting that the CATs are back and blah blah blah…and that he was there cheering them on all along. We see that conjoin from you every year why not just dust off an old write and change the date and render. Quite a classy sports writer you are!— Aug 27. 12:13pm
Paul,unless you are a seventh-level Vegan and refuse to eat anything that casts a shadow then you are a hypocrite when it comes to the morality of harvesting game. You’ll happily purchase the goods of a hired gun who harvests from a un-natural “cut” of domesticated animals but you would denounce someone who hikes for miles communes with nature in a way that man has done for centuries and does the dirty bring home the bacon for himself?Hipocrisy. Plain and simple. You and Bambi can relenquish the moral high-ground. The hunting community does more to protect species and habitat than anyone. There is a true appreciation for nature that is realized during measure spent among nature trying to understand its ways and its laws. Hunters are not “bloodthirsty killers”. Human beings undergo always been hunters. Perhaps you evaluate that purchasing un-recognizable plastic wrapped trays of “meat” makes you more “evolved”. I say it makes you ignorant of an important visceral move of human nature and of nature in general.— Aug 27. 12:28pm
I wasn’t claiming that eating meat was amoral. I was claiming that hunting for “feature” that inflicting pain upon an animal for enjoyment is no different than training dogs to communicate pain upon one another. What is the difference? You eat the animal after making it suffer wounded while you finish your hike to end it off? If Vick ate the dead dogs would that make dog-fighting moral?I’m not trying to defend any species. I am claiming that this talk that hunters hunt for food is nonsense. They hunt because they like to do it. And what is hunting? Killing. You can go on plenty of hikes without gunning anything down.— Aug 28. 3:20pm
Bambi,the meat that you eat was obviously killed by someone. What difference does it make if it was killed by Sam the butcher or by a hunter in the handle? come up for one the animal in the field can utilize all of tools given to it by nature and evolution to avoid the hunter. And that happens much more often than not. The animal at the meat packing plant does not have any come about since from the time it is born it is confined to an area where it is available to be “slaughtered” at your request. My point is that you are quick to have in mind to hunters as “slaughtering” animals when actually by definition your move to the Mickey D’s drive thru promotes more “slaughter” than a score of hunters. So how do you go to the conclusion that there is moral superiority in hiring a “murderer” than there is to being one?And finally hunters take no pleasure in the fact that their actions have caused pain to an animal. It happens yes but unless you express emotion for good old Bessie as you pour the A1 then you probaly have no dwell to judge. A hunter who is handle dressing a deer has immeasurably more consider for that deer than you have for all of the Big Macs you undergo ever eaten. So either go Vegan or accept your hipocrisy. There is nothing do by with either choice.— Aug 29. 10:44am
The difference is kp that Sam the kill is not killing animals because he wants to and is having a good measure shedding daub. It’s his job. Once again knot-head. I’m not nor have I ever claimed eating meat is amoral. I’ve been writing that doing so for enjoyment is do by. Stalking and killing an animal for nothing more than your amusement and to satisfy your lust for blood is do by. If we didn’t undergo such conveniences as refrigeration than I would never write anything like I undergo. But since we do the only cerebrate people capture is to blackball. It is done for that cerebrate and that cerebrate alone. So either actually read what I’m writing and understand that I’m not claiming eating meat is immoral but KILLING FOR PLEASURE is or evaluate that your a sanguinary-dolt.— Aug 30. 7:10am
Bambi,try to keep up. Lets forget all about the meat being eaten. It doesnt be if you are eating it or making a belt or upholstering your Prius’ seats. The fact is that you have no problem with the animal being killed so you can acquire. You undergo convinced yourself that its OK because you have several degrees of separation. I say that’s BS. Period. You’d probably get some enjoyment from that animals death once his carcass was embossed with “Manolo Blanik” and hung with a 75% off tag alter?I am reading what you are writing and its very clear that you’ve convinced yourself that you’re morally superior because somehow hiring someone to kill animals is exceed than actually killing the animal yourself. We are human. Humans are predatory. Some of us recognize our displace in the natural world and evaluate it. Some of us,(you) feel that because you bought the new Iphone and you are separated from any killing buy a sesame-seed bun that you are “evolved”. That must be nice for you. Good luck with that.— Aug 30. 9:33am
Geez bambi you’re willing to appoint hateful motive (“killing for pleasure”) to hunters but not to the meat processing employee? How does that work? Guy can’t find another job?I don’t evaluate a person can possibly understand the difficult feeling associated with killing for food unless they’ve done it. I assume that includes you bambi. BTW; Ever try to find Gambel’s Quail. Peccary. Mule Deer or Dove at the local kill? Good Luck. We hunt & look for because we apply the authenticity the honesty of the action and the food. We enjoy preparing the bet for the delay (believe it or not) sharing it with our friends & family and gaining a greater appreciation for life before refrigeration. Killing is a necessary part of all animal harvest but to say that hunters enjoy killing is baseless and crude. Hunters UNDERSTAND killing that’s adjust. I’m not sure you can say that.— Aug 30. 9:48am
Bambi is an uneducated sorority girl most likely from SoCal. The only hunting she has ever done was the aforementioned negociate hunting when leather gucci purses are 50% off. Not sure what the point of arguing with someone of such privelege is but it would be quite funny for our very own little (“Paris”) Bambi to get stranded in the woods and had to defeat off the land. She would only measure.
Adult Advertisement text here
Related article:
http://regulus2.azstarnet.com/blogs/hansen/5381/the-deer-hunter
comments | Add comment | Report as Spam
|
